Mathetes
chrislholland
read my profile
sign my guestbook

Visit chrislholland's Xanga Site!

Name: Chris
Country: United States
State: Texas
Metro: Lubbock
Birthday: 11/4/1984
Gender: Male


Interests: Christ, Religon, Phillosophy, Music, Video Games, Hockey, and some other stuff.
Occupation: Computer related (Internet)
Industry: Computers (Internet)


Message: message meEmail: email me
Website: visit my website
AIM: chNapalm
MSN: chrislholland@gmail.com
Yahoo: napalm_
Jabber: chrislholland@gmail.com (Google Talk)


Member Since: 11/4/2005

SubscriptionsSites I Read
I_am_Phillip
emprise34
kristenalyssa
aneahoyle
luvspssnpploff
j3sus_fr3ak77

Posting Calendar

|<< oldest | newest >>|
view all weblog archives

Get Involved!

Suggest a link

Recommend to friend

Create a site


Thursday, February 08, 2007

Godly Men

New essay, Godly Men, posted on Prinshopman.com.  Comments are more than welcome and can be left on this blog entry.


Monday, February 05, 2007

Marriage and the Resurrection

Luke 20:27-38

Then some Sadducees stepped forward – a group of Jews who say there is no resurrection after death. They posed this question: "Teacher, Moses gave us a law that if a man dies, leaving a wife but no children, his brother should marry the widow and have a child who will be the brother's heir. Well, there were seven brothers. The oldest married and then died without children. His brother married the widow, but he also died. Still no children. And so it went, one after the other, until each of the seven had married her and died, leaving no children. Finally, the woman died, too. So tell us, whose wife will she be in the resurrection? For all seven were married to her!"Jesus replied, "Marriage is for people here on earth. But that is not the way it will be in the age to come. For those worthy of being raised from the dead won't be married then. And they will never die again. In these respects they are like angels. They are children of God raised up to new life. But now, as to whether thedead will be raised – even Moses proved this when he wrote about the burning bush. Long after Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob had died, he referred to the Lord as 'the God of Abraham, the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob.' So he is the God of the living, not the dead. They are all alive to him."
New Living Translation

Years ago this passage of scripture was more than difficult for me to accept. I guess you could say I had the same question as the Sadducess in my heart, however, unlike them I was not interested in debating the existence of the resurrection. I was concerned with the question they used to mask there intentions, the specifics regarding marriage and death. In the same way we try to own material things we also try to own our relationships.

It seems that in our relationships here on earth we can easily loose our focus on God because of an intense focus on each other. We order our lives to live strictly on behalf of a significant other here on earth, and put God down as a close second (or a distant 4th, 5th or worse). In my particular case, the language was the most evident sign of my problem. I used phrases such as "my (Person's Name)" constantly in speech about my significant other. This language is much different from that of "my wife", or "my father", or "my mother", etc. The language more closely represented phrases like "my car", or "my house", possessive language rather than title based like wife, mother, or father. Though it says in the Scriptures "I am my beloved's and my beloved is mine" (Song of Solomon 6:3 NASB). I do not believe the Scriptures hold true to the idea of one owning the other. When woman was created she was described by the scriptures in Genesis 2:18 as "a helper suitable for him" (NIV), "a companion" (NLT), "an help meet" (KJV). If God were looking to give Adam something to own, in this situation God would have given him a shovel.


Wednesday, November 22, 2006

Blessed Assurance

New essay, Blessed Assurance, posted on Prinshopman.com.  Comments are more than welcome and can be left on this blog entry.


Morality issues in Interpersonal Deception Theory

New essay, Morality issues in Interpersonal Deception Theory, posted on Prinshopman.com.  Comments are more than welcome and can be left on this blog entry.


Friday, September 08, 2006

Fruit

Galations 5:22 - 23

But the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness, self-control; against such things there is no law.
New American Standard

What is fruit?  An apple is a fruit.  It is produced by an apple tree and used by humans for nutrition. It is also the apples trees method of producing more apple tress.  In the case of Galations 5 fruit is used in a similar sense.  It is a product of the Spirit (part of the trinity, note the capitalization) in us.  Note that you do to get something, it is a result, not a cause.  Hense, you do not love to get the Spirit, the Spirit enables you to love. When we live by the Spirit (follow what the Spirit tells you to do) then the spirit gives you the fruit of the spirit.  We can not produce this fruit on our own; if so, it would be called the fruit of men, and it is not.

Also note that the fruit of the Spirit is one gift with 9 qualities, not 9 seperate gifts.  Look at the text, you have the word fruit which is singular and the word is that is used with a single subject.  So do not say I have the fruit of self-control, but need to work on the fruit of kindess.  You do not produce the fruit, the Sprit does.  So if you want love, or joy or anyother quality of the fruit of the Spirit it can only come from one person, the Spirit.  On our own non of the qualities can be acheived, but with the help of the Spirit all are given together.



Next 5 >>